DMGT

ISSN 1234-3099 (print version)

ISSN 2083-5892 (electronic version)

https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Journal Impact Factor (JIF 2022): 0.7

5-year Journal Impact Factor (2022): 0.7

CiteScore (2022): 1.9

SNIP (2022): 0.902

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Article in volume


Authors:

M. Doki

Masayoshi Doki

Yokohama National University

email: masayoshi19@outlook.jp

Y. Egawa

Yoshimi Egawa

Tokyo University of Science

email: disc_student_seminar@rs.tus.ac.jp

N. Matsumoto

Naoki Matsumoto

Keio University

email: naoki.matsumo10@gmail.com

0000-0003-2861-7152

Title:

Graph grabbing game on graphs with forbidden subgraphs

PDF

Source:

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 44(1) (2024) 171-197

Received: 2020-09-30 , Revised: 2021-11-07 , Accepted: 2021-11-08 , Available online: 2021-11-22 , https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt.2440

Abstract:

The graph grabbing game is a two-player game on a connected graph with a weight function. In the game, they alternately remove a non-cut vertex from the graph (i.e., the resulting graph remains connected) and get the weight assigned to the vertex. Each player's aim is to maximize his or her outcome, when all vertices have been taken. Seacrest and Seacrest proved that if a given graph $G$ is a tree with even order, then the first player can win the game for every weight function on $G$, and conjectured that the same statement holds if $G$ is a connected bipartite graph with even order [D.E. Seacrest and T. Seacrest, Grabbing the gold, Discrete Math. 312 (2012) 1804–1806]. In this paper, we introduce a conjecture which is stated in terms of forbidden subgraphs and includes the above conjecture, and give two partial solutions to the conjecture.

Keywords:

graph grabbing game, forbidden subgraph, corona product

References:

  1. S. Chaplick, P. Micek, T. Ueckerdt and V. Wiechert, A note on concurrent graph sharing games, Integers 16 (2016) #G1.
  2. V. Chvátal, Tough graphs and Hamiltonian circuits, Discrete Math. 5 (1973) 215–228.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(73)90138-6
  3. J. Cibulka, J. Kynčl, V. Mészáros, R. Stolař and P. Valtr, Graph sharing games: Complexity and connectivity, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 494 (2013) 49–62.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2012.12.029
  4. J. Cibulka, R. Stolař, J. Kynčl, V. Mészáros and P. Valtr, Solution to Peter Winkler's pizza problem, in: Fete of Combinatorics and Computer Science, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud. 20 ({Springer, Berlin, 2010}) 63–93.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13580-4_4
  5. R. Diestel, Graph Theory, Fifth Edition, {in: Grad. Texts in Math. 173} (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017).
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53622-3
  6. D. Duffus, R.J. Gould and M.S. Jacobson, Forbidden subgraphs and the Hamiltonian theme, {in: The Theory and Applications of Graphs} (Wiley, New York, 1981) 297–316.
  7. Y. Egawa, H. Enomoto and N. Matsumoto, The graph grabbing game on $K_{m,n}$-trees, Discrete Math. 341 (2018) 1555–1560.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2018.02.023
  8. S. Eoh and J. Choi, The graph grabbing game on $\{0,1\}$-weighted graphs, Results Appl. Math. 3 (2019) 100028.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinam.2019.100028
  9. A. Gagol, P. Micek and B. Walczak, Graph sharing game and the structure of weighted graphs with a forbidden subdivision, J. Graph Theory 85 (2017) 22–50.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.22045
  10. P. van't Hof and D. Paulusma, A new characterization of $P_6$-free graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 158 (2010) 731–740.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2008.08.025
  11. A. Kelmans, On Hamiltonicity of $\{$claw, net$\}$-free graphs, Discrete Math. 306 (2006) 2755–2761.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2006.04.022
  12. K. Knauer, P. Micek and T. Ueckerdt, How to eat $4/9$ of a pizza, Discrete Math. 311 (2011) 1635–1645.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2011.03.015
  13. J. Liu and H. Zhou, Dominating subgraphs in graphs with some forbidden structures, Discrete Math. 135 (1994) 163–168.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(93)E0111-G
  14. M.M. Matthews and D.P. Sumner, Hamiltonian results in $K_{1,3}$-free graphs, J. Graph Theory 8 (1984) 139–146.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.3190080116
  15. P. Micek and B. Walczak, A graph-grabbing game, Combin. Probab. Comput. 20 (2011) 623–629.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963548311000071
  16. P. Micek and B. Walczak, Parity in graph sharing games, Discrete Math. 312 (2012) 1788–1795.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2012.01.037
  17. D.E. Seacrest and T. Seacrest, Grabbing the gold, Discrete Math. 312 (2012) 1804–1806.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2012.01.010
  18. F.B. Shepherd, Hamiltonicity in claw-free graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 53 (1991) 173–194.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8956(91)90074-T
  19. P.M. Winkler, Mathematical Puzzles: A Connoisseur's Collection (A K Peters/CRC Press, New York, 2003).
    https://doi.org/10.1201/b16493

Close