DMGT

ISSN 1234-3099 (print version)

ISSN 2083-5892 (electronic version)

https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Journal Impact Factor (JIF 2022): 0.7

5-year Journal Impact Factor (2022): 0.7

CiteScore (2022): 1.9

SNIP (2022): 0.902

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Article in volume


Authors:

G.Y. Katona

Gyula Y. Katona

University of Technology and Economics, Budapest

email: kiskat@cs.bme.hu

K. Varga

Kitti Varga

Department of Computer Science and Information Theory, Budapest University of Technology and Economics

email: vkitti@cs.bme.hu

Title:

Strengthening some complexity results on toughness of graphs

PDF

Source:

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 43(2) (2023) 401-419

Received: 2019-10-19 , Revised: 2020-10-10 , Accepted: 2020-10-13 , Available online: 2020-11-06 , https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt.2372

Abstract:

Let $t$ be a positive real number. A graph is called $t$-tough if the removal of any vertex set $S$ that disconnects the graph leaves at most $|S|/t$ components. The toughness of a graph is the largest $t$ for which the graph is $t$-tough. The main results of this paper are the following. For any positive rational number $t \le 1$ and for any $k \ge 2$ and $r \ge 6$ integers recognizing $t$-tough bipartite graphs is coNP-complete (the case $t=1$ was already known), and this problem remains coNP-complete for $k$-connected bipartite graphs, and so does the problem of recognizing 1-tough $r$-regular bipartite graphs. To prove these statements we also deal with other related complexity problems on toughness.

Keywords:

toughness, coNP-complete

References:

  1. D. Bauer, S.L. Hakimi and E. Schmeichel, Recognizing tough graphs is NP-hard, Discrete Appl. Math. 28 (1990) 191–195.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-218X(90)90001-S
  2. D. Bauer, A. Morgana and E. Schmeichel, On the complexity of recognizing tough graphs, Discrete Math. 124 (1994) 13–17.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(92)00047-U
  3. D. Bauer, J. van den Heuvel, A. Morgana and E. Schmeichel, The complexity of recognizing tough cubic graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 79 (1997) 35–44.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-218X(97)00030-9
  4. D. Bauer, J. van den Heuvel, A. Morgana and E. Schmeichel, The complexity of toughness in regular graphs, Congr. Numer. 130 (1998) 47–61.
  5. D. Bauer, H.J. Broersma and H.J. Veldman, Not every $2$-tough graph is Hamiltonian, Discrete Appl. Math. 99 (2000) 317–321.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-218X(99)00141-9
  6. V. Chvátal, Tough graphs and Hamiltonian circuits, Discrete Math. 5 (1973) 215–228.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(73)90138-6
  7. B. Jackson and P. Katerinis, A characterization of $3/2$-tough cubic graphs, Ars Combin. 38 (1994) 145–148.
  8. D. Kratsch, J. Lehel and H. Müller, Toughness, Hamiltonicity and split graphs, Discrete Math. 150 (1996) 231–245.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(95)00190-8
  9. C.H. Papadimitriou and M. Yannakakis, The complexity of facets $($and some facets of complexity$)$, J. Comput. System Sci. 28 (1984) 244–259.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0000(84)90068-0

Close