DMGT

ISSN 1234-3099 (print version)

ISSN 2083-5892 (electronic version)

https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Journal Impact Factor (JIF 2023): 0.5

5-year Journal Impact Factor (2023): 0.6

CiteScore (2023): 2.2

SNIP (2023): 0.681

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

PDF

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 31(3) (2011) 415-427
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt.1555

SIGNED DOMINATION AND SIGNED DOMATIC NUMBERS OF DIGRAPHS

Lutz Volkmann

Lehrstuhl II für Mathematik
RWTH-Aachen University
52056 Aachen, Germany
e-mail: volkm@math2.rwth-aachen.de

Abstract

Let D be a finite and simple digraph with the vertex set V(D), and let f:V(D)→{−1,1} be a two-valued function. If ∑x ∈ N[v]f(x) ≥ 1 for each v ∈ V(D), where N[v] consists of v and all vertices of D from which arcs go into v, then f is a signed dominating function on D. The sum f(V(D)) is called the weight w(f) of f. The minimum of weights w(f), taken over all signed dominating functions f on D, is the signed domination number γS(D) of D. A set {f1,f2,…,fd} of signed dominating functions on D with the property that ∑i = 1dfi(x) ≤ 1 for each x ∈ V(D), is called a signed dominating family (of functions) on D. The maximum number of functions in a signed dominating family on D is the signed domatic number of D, denoted by dS(D).

In this work we show that 4−n ≤ γS(D) ≤ n for each digraph D of order n ≥ 2, and we characterize the digraphs attending the lower bound as well as the upper bound. Furthermore, we prove that γS(D)+dS(D) ≤ n+1 for any digraph D of order n, and we characterize the digraphs D with γS(D)+dS(D) = n+1. Some of our theorems imply well-known results on the signed domination number of graphs.

Keywords: digraph, oriented graph, signed dominating function, signed domination number, signed domatic number.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C69.

References

[1] J.E. Dunbar, S.T. Hedetniemi, M.A. Henning and P.J. Slater, Signed domination in graphs, Graph Theory, Combinatorics, and Applications, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1 (1995) 311-322.
[2] M.A. Henning and P.J. Slater, Inequalities relating domination parameters in cubic graphs, Discrete Math. 158 (1996) 87-98, doi: 10.1016/0012-365X(96)00025-8.
[3] H. Karami, S.M. Sheikholeslami and A. Khodkar, Lower bounds on the signed domination numbers of directed graphs, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 2567-2570, doi: 10.1016/j.disc.2008.04.001 .
[4] M. Sheikholeslami and L. Volkmann, Signed domatic number of directed graphs, submitted.
[5] L. Volkmann and B. Zelinka, Signed domatic number of a graph, Discrete Appl. Math. 150 (2005) 261-267, doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2004.08.010.
[6] B. Zelinka, Signed domination numbers of directed graphs, Czechoslovak Math. J. 55 (2005) 479-482, doi: 10.1007/s10587-005-0038-5.
[7] Z. Zhang, B. Xu, Y. Li and L. Liu, A note on the lower bounds of signed domination number of a graph, Discrete Math. 195 (1999) 295-298, doi: 10.1016/S0012-365X(98)00189-7.

Received 29 January 2010
Revised 26 April 2010
Accepted 27 April 2010


Close