DMGT

ISSN 1234-3099 (print version)

ISSN 2083-5892 (electronic version)

https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Journal Impact Factor (JIF 2023): 0.5

5-year Journal Impact Factor (2023): 0.6

CiteScore (2023): 2.2

SNIP (2023): 0.681

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory

Article in volume


Authors:

J.P. de Wet

Johan P. de Wet

University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences (CoE-MaSS)

email: johan.dewet@up.ac.za

M. Frick

Marietjie Frick

University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa

email: marietjie.frick@up.ac.za

Title:

Nested locally Hamiltonian graphs and the Oberly-Sumner Conjecture

PDF

Source:

Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 42(4) (2022) 1281-1312

Received: 2019-01-08 , Revised: 2020-07-03 , Accepted: 2020-07-03 , Available online: 2020-07-21 , https://doi.org/10.7151/dmgt.2346

Abstract:

A graph $G$ is locally $\cal P$, abbreviated $L{\cal P}$, if for every vertex $v$ in $G$ the open neighbourhood $N(v)$ of $v$ is non-empty and induces a graph with property $\cal P$. Specifically, a graph $G$ without isolated vertices is locally connected ($LC$) if $N(v)$ induces a connected graph for each $v\in V(G)$, and locally hamiltonian ($LH$) if $N(v)$ induces a hamiltonian graph for each $v\in V(G)$. A graph $G$ is locally locally $\cal P$ (abbreviated $L^2{\cal P}$) if $N(v)$ is non-empty and induces a locally $\cal P$ graph for every $v\in V(G)$. This concept is generalized to an arbitrary degree of nesting. For any $k\geq 0$ we call a graph locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian if it is $L^mC$ for $m=0,1,\ldots, k$ and $L^kH$ (with $L^0C$ and $L^0H$ meaning connected and hamiltonian, respectively). The class of locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian graphs contains important subclasses. For example, Skupień had already observed in 1963 that the class of connected $LH$ graphs (which is the class of locally $1$-nested-hamiltonian graphs) contains all triangulations of closed surfaces. We show that for any $k\geq 1$ the class of locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian graphs contains all simple-clique $(k+2)$-trees. In 1979 Oberly and Sumner proved that every connected $K_{1,3}$-free graph that is locally connected is hamiltonian. They conjectured that for $k\geq 1$, every connected $K_{1,k+3}$-free graph that is locally $(k+1)$-connected is hamiltonian. We show that locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian graphs are locally $(k+1)$-connected and consider the weaker conjecture that every $K_{1,k+3}$-free graph that is locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian is hamiltonian. We show that if our conjecture is true, it would be ``best possible'' in the sense that for every $k\geq 1$ there exist $K_{1,k+4}$-free locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian graphs that are non-hamiltonian. We also attempt to determine the minimum order of non-hamiltonian locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian graphs and investigate the complexity of the Hamilton Cycle Problem for locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian graphs with restricted maximum degree.

Keywords:

locally traceable, locally hamiltonian, Hamilton Cycle Problem, locally $k$-nested-hamiltonian, Oberly-Sumner Conjecture

References:

  1. J.A. Bondy and U.S.R. Murty, Graph Theory (Springer, 2008).
  2. G. Chartrand and R. Pippert, Locally connected graphs, Čas. Pěst. Mat. 99 (1974) 158–163.
  3. G.T. Chen, A. Saito and S.L. Shan, The existence of a $2$-factor in a graph satisfying the local Chvátal-Erdős condition, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 27 (2013) 1788–1799.
    https://doi.org/10.1137/12090037X
  4. J.P. de Wet, Local Properties of Graphs (PhD Thesis, University of South Africa, 2016).
    http://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/22278/thesis_de \%20wet_jp.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  5. J.P. de Wet and M. Frick, The Hamilton cycle problem for locally traceable and locally Hamiltonian graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 266 (2019) 291–308.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2019.02.046
  6. J.P. de Wet, M. Frick and S.A. van Aardt, Hamiltonicity of locally Hamiltonian and locally traceable graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 236 (2018) 137–152.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2017.10.030
  7. J.P. de Wet and S.A. van Aardt, Traceability of locally traceable and locally Hamiltonian graphs, Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 17 (2016) 245–262.
  8. M.R. Garey, D.S. Johnson and R.E. Tarjan, The planar Hamiltonian circuit problem is NP-complete, SIAM J. Comput. 5 (1976) 704–714.
    https://doi.org/10.1137/0205049
  9. A. Goldner and F. Harary, Note on a smallest non-hamiltonian maximal planar graph, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 6 (1975) 41–42.
  10. L. Markenzon, C.M. Justel and N. Paciornik, Subclasses of $k$-trees: characterization and recognition, Discrete Appl. Math. 154 (2006) 818–825.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2005.05.021
  11. D.J. Oberly and D.P. Sumner, Every locally connected nontrivial graph with no induced claw is Hamiltonian, J. Graph Theory 3 (1979) 351–356.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.3190030405
  12. C.M. Pareek, On the maximum degree of locally Hamiltonian non-Hamiltonian graphs, Util. Math. 23 (1983) 103–120.
  13. C.M. Pareek and Z. Skupień, On the smallest non-Hamiltonian locally Hamiltonian graph, J. Univ. Kuwait (Sci.) 10 (1983) 9–17.
  14. D.J. Rose, On simple characterizations of $k$-trees, Discrete Math. 7 (1974) 317–322.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(74)90042-9
  15. Z. Skupień, Locally Hamiltonian and planar graphs, Fund. Math. 58 (1966) 193–200.
    https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-58-2-193-200
  16. S.A. van Aardt, M. Frick, O. Oellermann and J.P. de Wet, Global cycle properties in locally connected, locally traceable and locally Hamiltonian graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. 205 (2016) 171–179.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2015.09.022

Close